Home News Assessing One-State and Two-State Proposals to Remedy the Israel-Palestine Battle

Assessing One-State and Two-State Proposals to Remedy the Israel-Palestine Battle


In Could 2021, the confrontation in Israel-Palestine once more assumed middle stage with many individuals questioning if this battle would ever finish (Worldwide Disaster Group 2021). The human prices have been excessive. Thousands and thousands of Palestinians and Israelis suffered psychological and emotional anxiousness. Lots of have been killed, hundreds wounded, and tens of hundreds displaced from their properties. Given the Israeli occupation and Israel’s superior navy firepower, over 90% of the casualties and displaced have been Palestinians. In idea, a method the battle may come to an finish is thru a negotiated diplomatic consequence, however what would such an consequence seem like? On this article, I take into account the 2 most-commonly mentioned negotiated options to the battle: 1) one state with equal rights for all Palestinians and Israelis in what’s at this time Gaza, Israel, and the West Financial institution and a pair of) two states, a State of Israel and a State of Palestine alongside one another. Every decision has advantages and disadvantages; neither choice is clearly extra useful or extra doubtless. Furthermore, there is no such thing as a impartial resolution rule that makes clear weigh the professionals and cons and select the higher choice.

One caveat: A dialogue of one-state and two-state options is just not exhaustive of all of the choices. The established order is the present actuality and should stay in place for years. In that actuality, Israel is the one impartial nation (the Jewish State), Israeli settlements within the West Financial institution proceed to develop, the Israeli occupation continues, and the Palestinian Authority has fairly restricted energy. The Israeli proper has advocated for sub-state choices for Palestinians (e.g. autonomy, self-rule) as a long-term decision, however such approaches have little assist amongst Palestinians.

A one-state resolution

A one-state resolution means there could be a single nation made up of pre-1967 Israel, the Gaza Strip, and the West Financial institution (Abunimah 2007; Azoulay and Ophir 2012; Lustick 2019; Munayyer 2019; and Tilley 2005). As a placeholder identify, let’s name this one, sovereign state “the Holy Land.” Each one that lives between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea would have equal particular person rights, no matter their ethnic or spiritual identification. They might reside anyplace they need within the Holy Land, and they might have the appropriate to vote in nationwide elections. The capital could be in Jerusalem, and the federal government would come with Jews and Palestinians. As I’ll additional clarify under, one state could possibly be solely based mostly on equal particular person rights, or it could possibly be a binational state that means the 2 communities (Jews, Palestinians) have some communal rights as properly.

The central impediment to this one-state imaginative and prescient is about Israel’s self-definition at this time and the way, if in any respect, that might transition to a single state with full equality for Palestinians and Israelis. Israel because the Jewish State is just not suitable with the Holy Land as a result of the latter assumes symbols, legal guidelines, and authorities insurance policies don’t favor Jews over Palestinians. But Israel at this time privileges Jews in some ways, e.g. in migration, housing, employment, political rights, and remedy by safety organs of the state. Why would Israeli Jews willingly forfeit these benefits? Few states ever willingly modified their self-definition or nationwide identification in such a major vogue as a consequence of exterior calls for somewhat than inside transformation.

Furthermore, may the Holy Land function the success of Zionism and as a refuge for world Jewry if it was not outlined because the Jewish State? What, for instance, would occur to the Regulation of Return, which provides a Jew from anyplace on this planet the appropriate to turn into a citizen of Israel? The legislation is a key pillar of the Jewish superiority constructed into the State of Israel, the very form of differentiation that undergirds the conception of Israel as an apartheid state (Human Rights Watch, 2021). However the legislation can also be tied to the concept of Israel as a secure haven for Jews, someplace they might routinely search safety if issues go badly of their dwelling nation (suppose violent anti-Semitism).

In concrete phrases, it’s tough to think about how the shift would happen within the state’s armed forces and safety and intelligence neighborhood. Would Palestinians be built-in into the Israeli navy and police to deliver the numbers nearer to 50/50 and to place Palestinians in key management roles? Would Palestinians leaders be given entry to Israel’s nuclear secrets and techniques? That appears exhausting to think about and but that’s what equality mandates. On the similar time, most Israeli Jews could be reluctant to concede unique management of the state’s safety choices, fearful that they’d not be protected in disaster moments.

What would equality imply in socioeconomic phrases? In the established order, Israeli Jews have many occasions the earnings and wealth of Palestinians. Would equality contain vital financial redistribution, one thing that itself may result in additional Israeli Jewish opposition to 1 state with equality? For comparability, the unification of East and West Germany confronted such financial challenges with gaps that weren’t as stark.

One risk is that the one state could possibly be a binational state with reserved communal rights. The nationwide civic identification and the Jewish or Palestinian ethnic identification may each proceed. How precisely to do this could be sophisticated. Essentially, would it not be based mostly on new symbols and concepts (e.g. one new flag) or mutual recognition of twin symbols (e.g. two flags: Israel and Palestine’s present flags)? Is it doable to think about a definition of the Jewish neighborhood as a subset of the Holy Land that might enable the nation to operate on the idea of equality and fulfill some or a lot of the sentiment of Israeli Jewish nationalism (Kelman 1999)?

A parallel downside would come up with the Palestinian proper of return. Palestinians, with backing from worldwide legislation and UN resolutions, declare a proper to return to their properties and land from pre-1948, the years earlier than the institution of the State of Israel. Over 5 million Palestinians are registered as refugees with the United Nations Aid and Works Company for Palestine Refugees within the Close to East (UNRWA). Whereas previous surveys recommend most of the refugees won’t need to return completely, however may be content material with visiting and receiving compensation, if even 10 or 20% moved to the Holy Land, it might have a notable impact on the Palestinian share of the inhabitants (Greenberg 2003). A majority of Jews would oppose the inflow. However many Palestinians would object to any decision that doesn’t acknowledge and handle the appropriate of return. In any case, Palestinian collective trauma is rooted in compelled displacement, particularly 1948 and the Nakba, the disaster of Israeli expulsion and lack of return. A powerful sense of Palestinian identification and safety could rely upon immediately addressing that preliminary displacement and its penalties.

Even when an Israeli-Palestinian settlement didn’t present full redress for Palestinian refugees, a restricted quantity – restricted by housing availability and monetary sources – may merely transfer to the cities from which they or their ancestors had been expelled or fled (within the instances the place such cities and cities nonetheless exist). They won’t have the ability to re-enter their actual home in, say, Jaffa or Haifa, however some flats or properties would doubtless be for hire or sale, a restricted, market-based reply to Palestinian dispossession. Implementing an answer for Palestinian refugees raises many questions (Abu-Sitta 2008; and Scheindlin, 2020).

In a one-state resolution, Israeli settlers would have positive aspects and losses. Israeli settlements are cities and outposts constructed within the West Financial institution since Israel occupied the land within the 1967 Conflict. First, most nations take into account settlements unlawful beneath worldwide legislation. With an agreed-upon Israeli-Palestinian decision and the top of the Israeli occupation, that might not be a difficulty. Second, at first look, it seems Israeli settlers may keep the place they’re now. Israel wouldn’t have to withdraw settlers or shut down any settlements since everybody would already be residing in the identical state, the Holy Land.

That stated, Israeli settlements within the West Financial institution have usually been constructed on Palestinian land and that would open the door to authorized wrangling. Within the State of Israel so far, the federal government, the judiciary, and the navy have aided and abetted the unlawful expropriation of Palestinian land for establishing or increasing settlements. However because the legislation and courts modified on this new one state, the Holy Land, presumably that favoritism towards Israeli Jewish claims would fade. Might the authorized or political system begin to un-do the questionable legal-territorial foundation of many Israeli settlements? Settlements won’t be as steady as they’re in the established order of Israeli occupation.

As well as, Jewish-only settlements would not have the ability to exclude Palestinians from residing in them for the reason that foundation of the Holy Land is equality for all. In actual fact, even in what’s at this time pre-1967 Israel, the usage of social suitability as a standards for who’s allowed to reside in a city – and the way in which it’s usually utilized to exclude Palestinians – must finish for equality to take maintain. Settlements in the established order are largely reflective of housing segregation, not equality. Many Jewish settlers would possibly oppose such a shift. All that stated, a housing exception could be if the one state was framed in binational phrases and granted Jews and Palestinians communal rights, too, thereby permitting separate housing by neighborhood.

The deepest problem to the success of 1 state ought to it come into being is whether or not Jews and Palestinians as co-citizens may kind working partnerships, or at the least co-exist, in a method that might enable the only state and society to operate with out frequent ethnic pressure and violence. The Could 2021 Jew-on-Palestinian and Palestinian-on-Jew violence inside pre-1967 Israel doesn’t bode properly for such a risk. Extra typically, some analysts fear the tendency towards inter-group hostility, not cooperation, is dominant (Haklai 2021; Olesker 2021; Sucharov 2021). On the similar time, tens of hundreds of Palestinian and Jewish residents of Israel stood side-by-side at protests denouncing battle and violence and calling for working collectively. There are organizations that illustrate profitable Arab-Jewish partnerships and the values that would assist one state operate amicably such because the Hand-in-Hand colleges, the Oasis of Peace, the Palestine-Israel Journal, the Dad and mom’ Circle, and Combatants for Peace. It may be tough to prevail within the face of hyper-nationalism, however there are kernels of a mutual and steady future.

In the meantime, although, sure actors in society would possibly properly be attempting to trigger the only state to fail. Some political events and leaders will make hypernationalist, ethnoreligious, or supremacist appeals that stoke inter-group animosity and battle. Even when such forces could possibly be contained or marginalized sufficient to push by way of to a one-state decision, they’d not disappear. Spoilers would possibly regularly search to undermine and unravel the agreed-upon decision. Briefly, defending the brand new establishment could be a seamless undertaking somewhat than a static impediment to beat.

One state would embody a number of different benefits not already talked about. It will have all of the attributes of a sovereign state. There could be no debate about its borders. The state and its borders would obtain broad worldwide recognition. The Palestinian drive for self-determination could be addressed and, arguably, achieved. Palestinians may once more freely take pleasure in Jerusalem.

A two-state resolution

A two-state resolution means there could be two states, a State of Israel and a State of Palestine positioned alongside one another (Beauchamp 2021). The State of Israel already exists as an impartial nation; its borders would largely revert to what they have been from 1949-1967. The State of Palestine could be positioned within the Gaza Strip and a contiguous part of the West Financial institution that encompasses 95% or extra of the West Financial institution territory. Jerusalem would function the capital of each states, with Israel’s sovereign capital in West Jerusalem and Palestine’s sovereign capital in East Jerusalem, although an actual division is sophisticated by the Israeli settlements (neighborhoods) that ring the core of East Jerusalem. The Previous Metropolis of Jerusalem, and maybe some adjoining holy websites, could be 1) shared 2) overseen by a global committee 3) or in some way divided between the 2 states. (A typical two-state variant is a confederal plan, however I don’t talk about it right here. See Avishai and Bahour 2021 and Scheindlin and Waxman 2016.)

Israeli settlements which are positioned alongside the Inexperienced Line, the dividing line between Israel and the West Financial institution previous to the 1967 Conflict, could be annexed to Israel. Israel would compensate Palestine with different land adjoining to the West Financial institution or Gaza at a 1:1 ratio. Israeli settlements within the midst of the State of Palestine could be closed and the Israeli Jewish settlers withdrawn, although a small variety of Jewish settlers would possibly search permission to remain on within the new State of Palestine. A token variety of Palestinian refugees could be admitted to Israel. All Palestinian refugees could be eligible for compensation and will transfer to the brand new State of Palestine. Palestine’s armed forces very doubtless would have sure extra constraints, at the least for an preliminary time interval. The states must come to agreements on dividing many different sources akin to airspace and water. Israel would stay self-defined because the Jewish state. It may proceed to advertise the concept of Israel as a secure haven for Jews; it may proceed the Regulation of Return permitting Jews from anyplace entry to Israeli citizenship.

In distinction, the Palestinian Proper of Return could be fulfilled solely in a slim sense. The overwhelming majority of Palestinian refugees wouldn’t have the flexibility to return to their household’s dwelling and land inside that have been positioned in what’s at this time the State of Israel. Somewhat, they may get monetary compensation, perhaps some symbolic acknowledgment of their plight, and entry to the brand new State of Palestine (comprising about 22% of historic Palestine). Whether or not this might fulfill most Palestinian refugees is an open query.

Most Israeli settlers would keep in place, however a large minority could be faraway from their properties. Maybe half 1,000,000 settlers would keep in place in East Jerusalem and in settlements alongside the Inexperienced Line. However 100,000 or extra (or fewer?) would transfer; implementation could be difficult (Krieger 2012; Sasley and Sucharov 2011). This might properly spark robust opposition from the Israeli settler motion. From the Israeli authorities’s perspective, the entire level of maintaining most settlers in place could be to attempt to reduce political opposition to a two-state resolution. I don’t know what would occur to settlers who had inserted themselves within the midst of enormous Palestinian populations in East Jerusalem in locations like Silwan, Sheikh Jarrah, or the Mount of Olives.

The standing of Jews in Palestine and Palestinians in Israel would stay difficult to deal with for exclusionary ethnonational definitions of statehood. Israeli irredentist organizations may come into being to protest the elimination of Jewish settlers from elements of the West Financial institution. Palestinian irredentist organizations may come into being to protest the unfinished decision of the appropriate of return and the small share of the territory that constitutes the brand new State of Palestine.

The identical threat of inter-ethnic pressure that I mentioned in relation to 1 state would apply to a shared metropolis of Jerusalem. In that metropolis, Palestinians and Israelis would want to work collectively as companions on a number of points, or at the least discover methods to co-exist. Palestine would incorporate the Palestinians in East Jerusalem who largely are at present residents, however not residents, of Israel. Moreover, the Israeli citizenry would nonetheless be 20% Palestinian so inside Jewish-Palestinian relations would stay a associated situation. Some Israeli Jews would possibly name for the revocation of Israeli citizenship for Palestinians and their expulsion to the brand new State of Palestine.

Whereas Israel would have all of the attributes of a sovereign state, Palestine would doubtless have some limits on its sovereignty, particularly when it comes to what could be allowed in its navy and police forces. A peace settlement would possibly element monitoring and supervision provisions involving third-parties or an Israeli navy presence on Palestine’s borders with Egypt and Jordan. There would must be an intensive negotiation in regards to the border between the states in addition to how Palestinians would transit between the 2 elements of the state, what are at this time known as Gaza and the West Financial institution. As soon as that was agreed upon, the states and their borders would obtain broad worldwide recognition. The Palestinian drive for self-determination could be achieved.

Many members of the worldwide neighborhood assist the two-state resolution, together with the European Union, the League of Arab States, Russia, the United Nations, and america. However Israeli-Palestinian negotiators, particularly in 2000-2001 (Oslo/Camp David/Taba) and 2007-2008 (Annapolis), have failed to succeed in settlement on a two-state resolution (Pressman 2003; Avishai 2011).

One level of observe is that the define I’ve introduced right here of a two-state resolution displays each Israel’s bargaining benefit because the extra highly effective get together and the adjustments on the bottom wrought by Israeli settlements. Absent such leverage, for instance, the logical dividing line could be the Inexperienced Line, and all Israeli settlers must transfer. Or, share Jerusalem as a capital is way more advanced due to Israeli Jewish settlers in and round East Jerusalem.

Weighing the choices

On 4 standards for evaluating the 2 choices, a two-state resolution in all probability does higher on these 4 metrics, however neither choice appears particularly promising or simpler to realize. Monetary price is a fifth doable standards that I don’t handle right here.

  1. Readability of blueprint – The 2-state resolution has extra main, unresolved points. For the two-state resolution, the place precisely would the border be drawn? Which Israeli settlements could be withdrawn? What counts as a settlement ‘alongside the Inexperienced line?’ What number of, if any, Palestinian refugees could be allowed to maneuver into Israel? What could be the standing of Jerusalem’s Previous Metropolis? What restrictions could be positioned on Palestinian navy and police forces? For a one-state resolution, the principle query is whether or not Jewish privilege could be totally eradicated or reworked into Jewish communal rights.
  2. Well-liked assist amongst Israelis and Palestinians – Polling suggests a two-state resolution is extra common than a one-state resolution amongst Palestinians and Israelis, however the ranges of assist range considerably amongst polls (PCPSR 2021; Palestinian-Israeli Pulse 2020). In 2020-21, it’s unsure whether or not any resolution definitively has majority assist. Furthermore, respondents in the identical survey could have completely different concepts about what precisely one- and two-state options entail. 
  3. Political feasibility – Neither choice appears politically possible by which I imply it’s exhausting to see how a plan would overcome current political opponents within the authorities and public sphere. A one-state resolution has to beat widespread Israeli Jewish opposition. And since Israel holds the territorial playing cards, that widespread Israeli Jewish opposition can’t be ignored. The precise type of one state would decide the extent of Palestinian opposition. A two-state resolution faces opposition from main actors and their supporters in each societies (Likud and the Israeli proper; Hamas). Israeli settlers and Palestinians refugees each have causes that they could strongly oppose two states.
  4. Worldwide assist – A one-state resolution has little worldwide assist. A two-state resolution has in depth worldwide assist, however no actor has been keen to make use of disincentives, e.g. UN Safety Council motion or commerce/help conditionality or withdrawal, to attempt to make it a actuality, particularly when it comes to urgent Israel. That is significantly necessary within the EU-Israeli relationship and the US-Israeli relationship. The USA has been keen to press Palestinian actors in materials phrases.


Abu-Sitta, Salman. 2008. “The Implementation of the Proper of Return,” Palestine-Israel Journal 15-16:3, https://pij.org/articles/1217/the-implementation-of-the-right-of-return

Abunimah, Ali. 2007. One Nation A Daring Proposal to Finish the Israeli-Palestinian Deadlock. New York: Metropolitan Books.

Azoulay, Ariella and Adi Ophir. 2012. The One-State Situation: Occupation and Democracy in Israel/Palestine. Stanford, CA: Stanford College Press.

Avishai, Bernard. 2011. “A Plan for Peace That Nonetheless Might Be,” New York Occasions Journal, February 7, https://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/13/journal/13Israel-t.html

Avishai, Bernard and Sam Bahour. 2021. “Need Israeli-Palestinian Peace? Strive Confederation,” New York Occasions, February 12, https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/12/opinion/israel-palestinian-confederation.html

Beauchamp, Zack. 2021. “In protection of the two-state resolution,” Vox, Could 26, https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/22442052/israel-palestine-two-state-solution-gaza-hamas-one

Greenberg, Joel. 2003. “Palestinian pollster gained’t again down,” Chicago Tribune, July 18, https://www.chicagotribune.com/information/ct-xpm-2003-07-18-0307180273-story.html

Haklai, Oded. 2021. “Social Transformation or a Two-State Answer to the One-State Downside,” Israel Research Evaluate 36:1, 144-148.

Human Rights Watch. 2021. “A Threshold Crossed: Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution,” April 27, https://www.hrw.org/report/2021/04/27/threshold-crossed/israeli-authorities-and-crimes-apartheid-and-persecution

Worldwide Disaster Group. 2021. “The Israel-Palestine Disaster: Causes, Penalties, Portents,” Could 14, https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/eastern-mediterranean/israelpalestine/israel-palestine-crisis-causes-consequences-portents

Kelman, Herbert C. 1999. “The Interdependence of Israeli and Palestinian Nationwide Identities: The Position of the Different in Existential Conflicts,” Journal of Social Points 55:3, 581-600.

Krieger, Zvika. 2012. “How one can Evacuate 100,000 Israelis From the West Financial institution,” The Atlantic, April 12, https://www.theatlantic.com/worldwide/archive/2012/04/how-to-evacuate-100-000-israelis-from-the-west-bank/255775/ 

Lustick, Ian. 2019. Paradigm Misplaced: From Two-State Answer to One-State Actuality. Philadelphia: College of Pennsylvania Press.

Munayyer, Yousef. 2019. “There Will Be a One-State Answer: However What Form of State Will It Be?” November/December, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/israel/2019-10-15/there-will-be-one-state-solution

Olesker, Ronni. 2021. “From Pessimism to Optimism and Again: The Two-State Dream and the One-State Actuality,” Israel Research Evaluate 36:1, 148-152.

Palestinian Middle for Coverage and Survey Analysis (PCPSR). 2021. Public Opinion Ballot Quantity 79, March 31, http://pcpsr.org/websites/default/information/Pollpercent2079percent20Englishpercent20fulltextpercent20Marchpercent202021.pdf

“Palestinian-Israeli Pulse: A Joint Ballot.” 2020. October, https://www.pcpsr.org/websites/default/information/Summarypercent20Report_percent20English_Jointpercent20Pollpercent20Octpercent202020.pdf

Pressman, Jeremy. 2003. “Visions in Collision: What Occurred at Camp David and Taba?” Worldwide Safety 28:2, 5-43.

Sasley, Brent and Mira Sucharov. 2011. “Resettling the West Financial institution settlers,” Worldwide Journal 66:4, 999-1017.

Scheindlin, Dahlia. 2020. “Neither Intractable nor Distinctive: A Sensible Answer for Palestinian Proper of Return,” April 28, https://tcf.org/content material/report/neither-intractable-unique-practical-solution-palestinian-right-return/

Scheindlin, Dahlia and Dov Waxman. 2016. “Confederalism: A Third Manner for Israel–Palestine,” The Washington Quarterly 39:1, 83-94.

Sucharov, Mira. 2021. “It’s Time,” Israel Research Evaluate 36:1, 152-155.

Tilley, Virginia. 2005. The One State Answer. Madison: College of Wisconsin Press.

The creator needs to thank Gary English, Diana Greenwald, Dana El Kurd, Brent Sasley, and Amos Zehavi for feedback on earlier drafts.

Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations