Home News Police chief says US intel didn’t warn of scale of Capitol riot

Police chief says US intel didn’t warn of scale of Capitol riot


The appearing head of the Capitol police will testify earlier than a Home committee as Congress continues to probe the violence.

United States Capitol Police have been conscious of the potential for violence from armed extremists when the Capitol was attacked by supporters of former President Donald Trump, however intelligence didn’t point out the doable scale of the occasion and officers grew to become overwhelmed by “insurrectionists”, the appearing police chief is about to testify in a Home listening to.

Intelligence collected forward of the January 6 assault on the Capitol advised that the gathering would have the participation of armed “militia members, white supremacists, and different extremist teams,” Yogananda Pittman mentioned in ready testimony to be delivered on Thursday earlier than the Home Appropriations Committee.

Pittman was the assistant chief of police of the division’s Protecting and Intelligence Operations and was accountable for its Intelligence and Interagency Coordination Division (IICD) on the day of the riot, which got here after weeks of Trump claiming that the election had been “stolen” and moments after the previous president held a rally urging his supporters to “battle” the outcomes.

The IICD mentioned in an evaluation issued on January 3 that Trump supporters noticed January 6 because the final alternative to overturn the outcomes of the presidential election and their sense of desperation and disappointment “might result in extra of an incentive to turn out to be violent”.

“Whereas the Division was ready to neutralise and take away people or teams partaking in civil disobedience or violence among the many demonstrators, it was shortly overwhelmed by the 1000’s of insurrectionists (many armed) who instantly and with out provocation started attacking officers, bypassing bodily obstacles, and refusing to adjust to lawful orders,” Pittman added.

“The Division’s preparations have been primarily based on the data it gathered from its legislation enforcement companions just like the FBI and others throughout the intelligence group, none of which indicated {that a} mass rebellion of this scale would happen on the US Capitol on January sixth,” she mentioned.

Pittman additionally says the division confronted “inner challenges” because it responded to the riot. Officers didn’t correctly lock down the Capitol complicated, even after an order had been given over the radio to take action. She additionally says officers didn’t perceive once they have been allowed to make use of lethal drive, and that less-than-lethal weapons that officers had weren’t as profitable as they anticipated.


The Capitol assault delayed the certification of Biden’s win by a number of hours, as lawmakers have been compelled to flee the indignant mob that overwhelmed safety forces. 5 individuals died within the violence.

Greater than 200 individuals have been charged to date for his or her roles within the riot, including some with ties to far-right fringe teams such because the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys.

Congressional inquiries

Pittman’s testimony comes as Congress continues to probe the January 6 violence and the security failings that led to it.

Supporters of US President Donald Trump breeched safety and entered the Capitol as Congress debated the 2020 presidential election vote certification [File: Saul Loeb|/AFP]

The inquiries come within the wake of Trump’s acquittal on February 14 in a Senate trial after being impeached on the cost of “incitement to rebellion” for his function.

Legislators have additionally mentioned they’ll arrange a 9/11-style impartial fee to research the riot.

An FBI warning {that a} protest by Trump supporters may flip violent reached the US Capitol Police the day earlier than the assault, however prime officers in command of securing Congress that day didn’t see it, they instructed lawmakers on Tuesday.

Pittman’s predecessor, Steven Sund, mentioned that whereas the Capitol police drive had ready for “the potential for violence” and armed protesters, they’d not skilled for the “risk of a coordinated military-style assault involving 1000’s in opposition to the Capitol”.

Sund additionally testified that he had requested Nationwide Guard troops to be deployed two days earlier than January 6, however was instructed by the previous Home sergeant at arms, Paul Irving, that “he was involved concerning the ‘optics’ of getting Nationwide Guard current”.

Irving on Tuesday denied that optics performed a job within the determination to not pre-emptively deploy Nationwide Guard troops, saying as a substitute the “intelligence didn’t warrant it”.