Home News Thursday Night time Owls: Washington state lawmakers ponder a 1% wealth tax

Thursday Night time Owls: Washington state lawmakers ponder a 1% wealth tax


Many witnesses identified that Washington state has one of the vital regressive tax techniques within the nation, with no revenue tax, a weak company tax system, and an overdependence on gross sales taxes. “Low revenue households pay 18 p.c of their revenue in taxes whereas the very rich pay lower than 3 p.c,” noticed John Burbank from the Financial Alternative Institute in his testimony.

“This state is an excellent place to lift a household and to plant roots,” mentioned Mary Curry, a Tacoma resident and proprietor of a day care middle, in testimony earlier than the committee. “However how do I construct when the tax legal guidelines are so harsh to the working class resembling myself?”

Washington state has been hammered through the pandemic, with almost 312,000 state residents falling ailing from Covid and 4,300 deaths. An estimated 2.1 million of the state’s employees misplaced jobs through the accompanying recession. The state authorities is dealing with a three-year finances hole of $3 billion.

“Wealthy millionaires like me pay lower than what employees pay, even those that are barely getting by,” mentioned Dan Value, CEO of Gravity Funds. “Even after this tax, billionaires will nonetheless pay a decrease share than working individuals right here… We now have a $3.3 billion finances deficit that must be closed. There’s a straightforward approach to shut it.”

A lot of legislators pointed to research by the Americans for Tax Fairness (ATF) and the Institute for Coverage Research (IPS) on the rising focus of billionaire wealth. As of February 2019, Washington state’s 13 identified billionaires had $293 billion in wealth. By January 29, 2021, their complete wealth had elevated to $474 billion. Within the final 10 months, beginning with the pandemic lockdown in mid-March, Washington state billionaires noticed their wealth surge by a mixed $151 billion, a rise of over 47 p.c. […]


COVID Has Turned These Nursing Home Residents Into Activists Fighting to Show Their Lives Matter, by Molly Schwartz. New York has severely undercounted COVID deaths in these services.

If Senators Won’t Kill the Filibuster, They Should at Least Sweat for It, by Elie Mystal and The Nation. The present model of the filibuster calls for nothing of senators aside from the need to gum up democracy. That has to vary.

Have Democrats Finally Realized That Power Is Only Real If You Use It? by Sam Loeb. After many years of cowering below the yoke of bipartisanship, Democrats lastly confirmed a willingness to flex their energy.





“Extremism will generate each constructive and unfavorable reactions, or “engagements.” Fb measures engagement by the variety of clicks, “likes,” shares, and feedback. This design function—or flaw, in case you care concerning the high quality of data and debate—ensures that essentially the most inflammatory materials will journey the farthest and the quickest. Sober, measured accounts of the world don’t have any likelihood on Fb. And when Fb dominates our sense of the world and our social circles, all of us probably turn into carriers of extremist nonsense”
          ~~Siva Vaidhyanathan, Delinquent Media: How Fb Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy (2018)


On this date at Every day Kos in 2007—The Wages of Bigotry:

After they’re attempting to get you to vote for that referendum that bans same-sex marriage*, they inform you that it is all about The Sanctity of Marriage, and Defending Spiritual Freedom, and that after all it is not about Screwing Over Homosexual Individuals.  It isn’t going to disenfranchise anybody, they are saying—it is about setting some common sense limits.

Actions have penalties, although, and the individuals of Michigan are about to understand that their 2004 vote to ban same-sex marriage did, in truth, relegate a complete class of residents to everlasting second-class standing. As a result of the Michigan Courtroom of Appeals held at this time that the homosexual marriage ban additionally bans same-sex home accomplice advantages. […]

So even a quasi-autonomous public entity just like the College of Michigan is now prohibited from providing a few of its high workers home accomplice advantages. Single opposite-sex companions, after all, can proceed to take pleasure in the advantages. However homosexual workers and their households are SOL, even when they have been receiving household advantages for years. Is that what Michiganders anticipated once they handed their marriage ban? Who is aware of. However no matter what they anticipated, <>this is what you really get while you vote for a feel-good “safety of marriage” referendum.  It doesn’t matter what its purveyors inform you, in case you learn it carefully sufficient, someplace buried within the positive print, you will discover the wages of bigotry.  As we speak, we’re reminded that they finally come due.